|
February
2004
MODERN MONGOLIAN-CHINESE STRATEGIC
RELATIONS:CHALLENGES FOR THE NEW CENTURY
Dr. Alicia Campi, U.S.-Mongolia Advisory Group, Burke, Virginia
With the 21st Century upon us,
Mongolia and its neighbor and traditional antagonist China are carving
out a new multi-faceted strategic relationship. The two nations
have had rocky historical ties for over 1000 years. In the beginning
of the 20th century the two were part of the dying Manchu Empire,
and then both experienced two major political revolutions to restore
their national sovereignty and move them into the internationalist
socialist camp. Yet, by the end of the century Mongolia and China
had emerged from decades of isolation and embraced market economy
principles for their development strategies. Certainly these two
countries have very different cultural and economic mindsets, which
have negatively impacted on mutual understanding and political relations
throughout history. Over the last 400 years Russia has imposed itself
into the bilateral strategic balance and remains an important, although
diminishing factor, in today's calculation. New players in the strategic
equation for the 21st century are East Asian regional cooperation
in diverse forms, the North Korean nuclear and refugee problem,
environmental degradation, international terrorism, and even the
United States.
The 1990s brought significant changes to
Mongolia domestically and internationally. Its 70 year alliance
with the Soviet Union ended peacefully with the adoption of a democratic
Constitution and democratic elections in 1992. Mongolia, at least
the Outer Mongolia of Manchu times, had seen the Soviets as protectors
against their giant Chinese southern neighbor. Mongolian relations
with China, Republican and Communist, ebbed and flowed with Sino-Soviet
relations. Although Stalin-inspired purges in the 1930s decimated
the traditional noble class, Lamaist Church, and nomadic economy,
many Mongols saw Stalin sympathetically as the man who preserved
the independence of Mongolia at Yalta. After a plebiscite was conducted
in the country in October 1945, Kuomintang China recognized the
Mongolian People's Republic in January 1946. With the success of
the Chinese Communist revolution, Mongolia immediately recognized
the new Chinese government on October 6, 1949. However, it took
a trip of Mao Zedong to Moscow in early 1950 for the Chinese to
accede to the independent status of Mongolia in a joint Sino-Soviet
communiqué.
One should note that after the Communist
Revolution, the Kuomintang Government on Taiwan rescinded its recognition
of independent Mongolia until February 2002. Although the Taiwan
Kuomintang-controlled Government had an active assistance program
in Mongolia since the 1990s, brought Mongols to Taiwan for Chinese
language training and research, and had strong and growing trade
ties, Mongols still resented that Taiwan publicly treated Mongolian
citizens as their own, and did not recognize the Mongol passport.
In 2002 after national elections installed a non-Kuomintang Government,
Taiwan agreed to recognize Mongolian independence, phase out the
centuries-old special bureaucracy Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs
Commission, and in principle seek to change the Republic of China’s
Constitution to reflect its new view of Mongolia. Taiwanese Foreign
Minister Eugene Chien said, "The agreements signed by the two
sides were based on the principles of equality and reciprocity,
but did not involve diplomatic recognition." (1) Even though
the change to the Constitution has still been blocked and mutual
diplomatic recognition cannot take place as long as Mongolia follows
a one-China policy, these substantive moves on Taiwan’s part
were warmly received by the Mongol Government which in September
2002 agreed to the opening of a trade office in Ulaanbaatar called
"The Taipei Trade and Economic Representative Office."
By 2003 Mongolia’s own economic office in Taipei was upgraded
and its two diplomats adopted a higher profile.
In the 1950s Sino-Soviet relations were friendly,
and so were Sino-Mongolian relations. Thousands of Chinese workers
were sent up by train to Ulaanbaatar to provide manpower and expertise
for building projects. Trade relations were based on mutual assistance
with China supplying grants and soft loans as well as manpower.
Mongolia provided the Chinese with horses for the army and transport.
(2) But with the Sino-Soviet split in the mid-1960s, Mongolia was
forced by its ally to push away from China. Between 1960 to 1980
relations were stagnant. A bilateral treaty was signed with Moscow
in 1966 which included secret defense-related clauses and was the
sparkplug for a massive buildup of Soviet troops and missile bases,
particularly along the border. Even the death of Mao in 1976 did
not unfreeze relations. In fact, Mongolia doubled the size of its
army as requested by Soviet defense minister Ustinov. In 1979 Soviet
forces in Mongolia reached a peak of 120,000.
As Ts. Batbayar, one of Mongolia's leading
researchers on strategic and development studies, notes, Mongolia's
top leadership played its own "China card" with the Soviets
during that period to squeeze out more Soviet economic assistance.
The Chinese Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution denounced
Mongolia as a neo-colony of the Soviet Union. During the years between
1970 and 1990 the Soviets spent 600 million rubles to build a huge
copper plant called Erdenet in northern Mongolia, making it the
largest revenue-generating enterprise in the country. The Soviets
gave nearly 6 billion rubles to Mongolia in soft loans for capital
investment, 670 million rubles in non-repayable aid, and over 2
billion rubles in loans for balancing trade deficits. In the decade
of the 1980s long after a warming in Sino-Soviet relations, Mongolia
received the majority of this assistance. (3)
Gorbachev sought to remove some of the Soviet
soldiers and encouraged the new Mongolian leadership under Premier
Batmonkh to adopt economic reforms. Concurrently, Mongolia was watching
the economic changes in the PRC during the 1980s. With new policies
under the Deng Xiaoping government in 1985 the basis for the explosion
of Chinese-Mongolian economic relations was laid. Ulaanbaatar exchanged
visits with Beijing on a vice-minister level before Moscow did,
and as early as 1987 was talking about creating a mechanism of political
dialogue among Northeast Asian countries. (4) Dr. Batbayar believes
the breakthrough in Mongolia's relations with China was the May
1990 visit to Beijing of newly elected President P. Ochirbat, because
this was the first time a Mongol President went first to Beijing
not Moscow, and so effectively ended two decades of hostility. In
1991 Chinese President Yang Shangkun paid an official four-day visit
to Mongolia and concluded an agreement guaranteeing access to the
sea via Tianjin. Soviet troops were withdrawn from Mongolia by early
1992. Chinese Premier Li Peng came in April 1994 and signed a new
bilateral treaty. In the treaty's Article 4 the signatories promised
not to take party in military-political alliances against each other
with third countries. (5)
The main pillars of Mongolia's post-Cold
War international relations are outlined in two documents published
in the 1990s: Concept of National Security and Concept of Foreign
Policy. In these Mongolia sought continuity of foreign policy objectives
during its transition period after the collapse of communism. It
proclaimed an open, multi-pillared foreign policy, respect for human
rights, rule of law, support for democracy, free markets, and in
2002 added fighting international terrorism. One of its main foreign
policy objectives is "long term stable development of good
neighborly, equal and mutually beneficial ties with the Russian
Federation and People's Republic of China." (6)
The Treaty on Friendly Relations and Cooperation
with the Russian Federation was signed in 1993, replacing the 1966
“Agreement on Friendship and Co-operation” in which
the ally-relationship between the Soviet Union and Mongolia was
codified. Economic relations became the focus of Mongol-Russian
relations since the mid-1990s. Foreign ministerial and presidential
visits between the two countries take place on a regular basis.
V.V. Putin, President of the Russian Federation made a State visit
to Mongolia November 13-14, 2000, the first such visit in 26 years.
Although the resulting “Ulaanbaatar Declaration” reaffirmed
the importance of this old relationship, the issue of Mongolia’s
debt to Russia was not resolved. Progress on this thorny issue was
made during the June 2003 official visit to Moscow of Mongolian
Prime Minister N. Enkhbayar and subsequent January 13-14, 2004 visit
of Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov to Ulaanbaatar. The matter
finally was settled when Mongolia agreed that 98% of the US$10 billion
debt would be considered as investment and the remaining 2% or US$250
million would be repaid by the Mongolian Government.
As documented in a recent paper by Ts. Batbayar
and K. Demberel, Russia has been gradually driven out of the Mongolian
market. Russian market share fell from 85% in the early 1990s to
only 25% at the end of the decade. Russia retains special influence
only in the energy sector since it is a key supplier of oil and
some electricity. “Russia is in a weak position to guarantee
positive economic cooperation (the sending of experts, aid, loans
and investment etc) for near future.” (7) In 1998 40% of Mongolia's
imports were Russian, but only 10% of its exports were sent to Russia.
Mongolian export volume to Russia fell about 5 times because of
high customs and transit transportation tariffs and lack of solvent
Russian partners. Although Mongolian-Russian trade totaled $267.7
million in 2002, a 12.4% increase over 2001, the trade volume was
not close to the level of the socialist era.
It is very clear that the trade pattern is
changing in favor of one nation--China. In 1990 the USSR received
78.3% of Mongolia’s exports and Mongolia imported 77.5% of
its imports from the USSR. The Soviet Union in 1990 accounted for
77.9% of Mongolia’s total trade. In 1990 the PRC received
only 1.7% of Mongolia’s exports and Mongolia imported 2.4%
of its imports from PRC China. Trade turnover with China in 1990
stood at 2.1%. However, by 2001, Mongolian exports to Russia fell
dramatically to 10.3% and imports from Russia fell to 36.4%. The
trade volume with Russia was only 25.7% in 2001. Meanwhile, by 2001
Mongolian exports to China grew to 55.7% and Mongolia imported 21.9%
from China. China’s position as Mongolia’s largest trade
volume partner stood at 35.5%, a full 10 percentage points higher
than Russia. (8)
In 2002 the Mongol press reported there have
been 260 joint ventures with China, the value of investment put
at US$236 million compared to Russian investment value of US$31
million (less than the U.S. investment of US$50 million). (9) This
represents 31% of all foreign enterprises in Mongolia and 21% of
the total foreign investment. According to a high-ranking Mongol
official writing one year later, there were 687 officially registered
Chinese enterprises (349 joint ventures and 84 100% Chinese investment
companies), while only 297 Russian companies (170 being investment
companies). The same official source cited China as the largest
investor in Mongolia from 1990-2001 with investment of US$136.9
million while Russia was the 5th largest investor in Mongolia for
a total of US$29.8 million. (10). The majority of these Chinese
investments in the 1990s were in animal husbandry and by-products
light industry, construction, agriculture and the service industry
because the Mongolian Government deliberately kept the Chinese presence
in the large state industries including the mineral sector to a
minimum. However, in the last two years gold, oil, and other mineral
concessions have been let out to Chinese, so major investment has
accelerated.
In 1997 China became Mongolia’s leading
investor and Mongolian-Chinese trade turnover stood at $252 million,
an increase of 26.7% over 1996. Reasons for the increase were the
mutual decision to reduce trade charges 50% and increase foreign
trade transportation between Mongolia and China, China’s takeover
of the Mongol cashmere goat hair export market, and Mongolia export
of oil almost exclusively to the Chinese. (11) At the September
2002 Foreign Investor Conference in Ulaanbaatar, about 150 investors
from over 100 companies were from China, the highest number of attendees,
while only 84 came from Russia and 29 from the U.S. (12)
During the last decade the improvement in Mongolian-Chinese political
relations has spurred economic ties. Mongolian President N. Bagabandi
made a state visit to China in December 1998 and in the resulting
joint communiqué the two sides expressed their intention
to develop long term trade and economic relations. (13) The Chinese
Communist Party Chairman Jian Zemin reciprocated the visit in 1999.
Nowadays similar high-level exchanges are the norm. For example,
on September 24, 2002, Li Tian, member of the Political Bureau of
the CCP Central Committee and President of the Chinese Social Science
Academy arrived in Ulaanbaatar with a delegation that included leaders
from Shandong province. They met the Mongolian President, Prime
Minister, Speaker of the Parliament and President of the Academy
of Sciences, as well as visited Ulaanbaatar's Chinese-language secondary
school. (14) At the World Summit 2002 on Sustainable Development
in Johannesburg, South Africa President Bagabandi met with Chinese
Premier Zhu Rongji to talk about increasing Chinese investments,
and implementing infrastructure, mining and environmental protection
projects along the border. (15) In 2003 Chinese President Hu Jintao
traveled to Mongolia to discuss deepening bilateral cooperation.
Since the Mongol debt to Russia has just
been settled, attention will turn to the formidable debt owed to
China. Mongolia owes China 28.3 million convertible roubles including
interest from 1958-1960 loans. There is also outstanding trade fees
equaling 5.6 million Swiss francs and in 2006 payment must begin
on 130 million yuan interest-free loans borrowed between 1991-1994.
There were additional Chinese interest-free loans of 100 million
yuan in 1998, 100 million yuan in 2000, and 300 million yuan in
2003. During the past decade Russian financial assistance has dried
up while Chinese aid has become significant. During the period of
1991-1997 42.6 million yuan was given to Mongolia in aid. The next
two years saw aid increase to 30 million yuan per year. Although
the assistance program fell to only 1 million yuan in 2000 and 4
million yuan in 2001, large assistance resumed in 2002 and 2003
to the level of 50 million yuan per year, mainly in the building
sector for constructing apartments for military personnel. (16)
In 2000-200l China donated 2 million yuan to fight foot and mouth
disease and winter disaster assistance. (17)
Cultural and educational contacts also are
blossoming. At the end of the socialist era a few Mongol teachers
and 15 Mongol students went each year to China. By 2000 these numbers
in the student exchange program had grown to 50, and privately funded
students in China also increased. (18) In October 2002 77 Chinese
students from Hebei University and Inner Mongolia began studying
at a new university in Ulaanbaatar. (19) The President of the Chinese
Olympics Committee visited Ulaanbaatar to exchange views on preparation
for the 2008 Olympic Games. In September 2002 over fifty art perfomers
led by the Ulaanbaatar Mayor, M. Enkhbold, attended Ulaanbaatar
Cultural Days in Hohehot in Inner Mongolia, China. The Mayor signed
a document for cooperation between the two cities for 2003-2005
with the Mayor of Hohehot. In addition to the art and photo exhibitions,
about 20 Mongolian companies advertised their products and held
meetings with Chinese counterparts. (20) On the occasion of the
53rd anniversary of the PRC, the Chinese Ambassador to Mongolia
Huang Yakui gave an interview to a major Mongolian newspaper and
said "Let's cooperate for development and renovation!"
He emphasized his government was paying more attention to developing
relations and trade with Mongolia, and noted that when he arrived
in the country three years earlier, there were 400 Chinese companies
active. By mid-2002 the number had increased to over 600. (21)
Prior to 1990 Mongols could not travel to
China. Visa requirements have now been relaxed so that Mongolian
citizens can go to China without a visa up to one month. Mongolians
also are eligible to participate in the inexpensive health service
in China, so many Mongols go there for medical treatment since the
1999 Medical Treatment Agreement was signed. In 2001 33,000 Mongols
took part in such medical travel. (22)
There appears a consensus in Mongolia today
that the national interest is best served by a China involved in
economic development and committed to peaceful cooperation with
its neighbors. (23) Arising from this point of view is the belief
of many Mongolian policymakers and strategists that it would be
to Mongolia's advantage to align itself with Northeast Asian countries
or even Central Asian countries to assure economic growth. Mongolia
sees itself as a potential landbridge to Europe and the Middle East
for East Asia. This would give it greater leverage in its bilateral
relations with China. Whether or not the Chinese would encourage
such a new role for Mongolia is not very clear. Mongolia in the
1990s was a successful conduit for trade between China and Siberian
Russia that overcame the history of contentious relations between
the two peoples, so perhaps Mongolia in the future could facilitate
trade for China in a westerly direction into Turkic Muslim areas.
On the northern border with Russia the Mongolian
Parliament seeks to create a free trade zone between the Mongol
city of Altanbulag and the Russian city of Khiagt. On September
24, 2002 a new transport checkpoint opened with capacity for 500
trucks and 2300 persons daily. The Mongols spent $US 5 million to
open the center. On the Mongolian Russian border 29 land harbors
(4 international and cargo, 9 two-way for travel and cargo, 9 temporary,
and 7 pass-through posts) have been established. (24) However, only
Khiagt and Khandgait have major facilities. In fact, in the July
31, 2002 edition of the Business & Economic News in the English-language
newspaper, The Mongol Messenger, in Ulaanbaatar, the parliamentarian
responsible for economics told the press that with China in the
WTO, its economy should grow even more rapidly with bigger foreign
investors in its market: "Thus, the legislation for the Altanbulag
Free Trade Zone was an important step towards Mongolian access to
the markets of its two neighbors." (25)
The legal basis for a similar trade free
zone has been established at the railway border point into China.
The Mongol city of Zamin Uud and Chinese city of Erlien span this
area. Plans for development include the establishment of manufacturing
plants and a Chinese casino. The population of Zamin Uud would likely
increase from 10,000 to 30,000. The Chinese are interested in building
a modern road network from Inner Mongolia into the Gobi provinces.
This would facilitate expansion of Chinese investment in mineral
deposits and large-scale animal husbandry operations in southern
and eastern Mongolia. (26) Nevertheless, the Mongol authorities
are resisting Chinese pressure to develop this zone quickly. Discussion
in January 2002 took place in Beijing between Mongol Prime Minister
Enkhbayar and Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji to work out the technical
problems. Mongols would like to establish the northern Russian border
zone first and then move to the southern Chinese border project.
The hesitation, frankly, is involved with
Mongolian feelings that the Chinese businessmen/settlers/tourists
could overwhelm them. Today Chinese migration flows north along
the railway in large numbers to Russian Siberian cities. This phenomenon
is seen by some analysts as part of a great historical migration
of urban Chinese, coveting oil, coal, mineral deposits and empty
grasslands of Mongolia and Siberia. The history of mistrust and
hostility still influences decisionmaking on both sides. Mongolian
officials in private express their strong fear of expansionist China,
which has in the past fifty years reabsorbed Tibet, Macao and Hong
Kong, and now is fixating on Taiwan and Mongolia: “China is
not interested in developing Mongolia’s economy, but in exploiting
our natural resources. …The Chinese have the possibility to
utterly absorb us.” (27) It has been said that a weak, fragmented
China is feared even more by the Mongols, who remember the civil
wars of the early Twentieth Century and the fallout from the Cultural
Revolution in the 1960s and 1970s, because it could cause the growth
of Central Asian terrorism and drug trafficking organized by Muslim
Uighur and Chechen militants and organized crime to spill into Mongolian
territory. Foreign policy researchers in Mongolia have not published
much on this topic as if unwilling to conceive of the possibility
of a breakup of their southern neighbor while still experiencing
all the shocks from the dissolution of their Soviet former protector.
Only during the last twenty years has China
showed much interest in regional cooperation, but "as economic
development and modernization became the driving force for Chinese
foreign policy, Beijing has taken a more positive view of East Asian
regional economic cooperation." (28) Yet, China remains sensitive
to the concept of regional interdependence, because it may impose
limits on domestic and foreign policy options. The Deng Xiaoping
era moved the Chinese focus to economic reforms and modernization
and away from politics and ideology. In the post-Deng era the political
elite continue to share this view, so based on a domestic political
consensus, China's foreign policy goal since the late 1970s is to
maintain a peaceful international environment. In order to speed
up development and modernization China believes economic ties with
other Asian states should expand through economic cooperation and
eventually they will integrate the Chinese economy into the global
economy. This strategy will bring political power to China and greater
national security. Thus China felt it was important to be a member
of APEC and then the World Trade Organization. Now its policymakers
are seriously examining the various formulations for a Northeast
Asian Economic Cooperation Zone.
Chinese scholar Hu Weixing claims that China's
attitudes towards regional cooperation stem from certain contextual
theories: 1) regional cooperation is conducive to Chinese economic
development. 2) potential costs of regional integration should be
carefully examined. 3) Asian countries should have a common position
on human rights and democratization to balance that of the West.
4) East Asian relations require security issues to be solved bilaterally
not multilaterally. 5) no effective multilateral security regime
can be established without full consent of all member states. (29)
Of course, China like Mongolia and really all countries derives
its economic and security policies from its view of its economic
interests and regional security concerns. This paper will not examine
in depth the political ramifications within China because of the
country's turn to international trade and subsequent internal disparity
of income with social instability. But, these trends have actually
affected the Chinese bi-lateral relationship with Mongolia to perhaps
unexpected degrees. Because China's inland provinces and West have
not benefited much from China's meteoric economic rise, and in the
regions along the northern border with Mongolia and Russia there
is ethnic unrest particularly among Muslim peoples, China sees new
benefit from expanding bilateral and regional cooperation with Mongolia.
China’s development strategy from the
1980s focused on the Southeast coastal region and its relationships
with the big powers, Soviet Russia, the U.S. and Japan. At the end
of the 20th century China launched its West development strategy
and saw value in regional cooperation, e.g. the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization. Another new influence has been its entrance into the
WTO. China is paying attention to cross-boundary ethnic groups and
their separatist inclinations. Western China is 56% of the Chinese
territory holding 50% of the country’s minerals. The goals
of its policy go beyond economic development to “create a
prosperous and stable frontier area.” (30) The growth rates
in the west are still considerably below the east coast of China.
The western development strategy is trying to increase development
rates by the middle of the 21st century. The government is trying
to put in place legislation to achieve sustainable development and
prevent ecological deterioration, trying to learn from the negative
experience of eastern provincial development. Already there are
laws to increase financial aid and investment to ethnic autonomous
regions with special preferential tax treatment to promote agriculture,
processing of minerals and tourism.
The focus of the development is in the provinces
of Gansu, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Shanxi, and Inner Mongolia, and Chinese
authorities recognize that these regions must emphasize closer ties
with the Russian Far East and Mongolia. The Chinese central government
has agreed that “local governments can go ahead” in
the region to avoid the central government becoming involved in
local disputes. The PRC leaders believe that because the surrounding
countries see West China as a huge potential international market,
increasing economic growth and living standards in West China will
improve the nation’s foreign trade, investment, and cooperation
with neighbors. Therefore, the Chinese have promoted concrete actions
such as establishing more boundary-trade ports with Mongolia, as
well as with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan, encouraging foreign
investment by nationals of these countries, and facilitating custom
systems. (31)
However, to do this China must have a peaceful
surrounding environment for its internal stability and development,
as well as to obtain resources from the border nations to meet its
energy, oil, and food needs. Central Asian countries and Mongolia
are frequently mentioned as the countries concerned that share “crucial
geopolitical interests” with China and its west development
strategy. (32) In the 1990s and particularly since Sept. 11th, China
sees the necessity of expanding ties with neighboring states to
restrict operations of Islamic separatist groups who were/are supported
by Iran, Afghanistan Taliban, and Saudi Arabia. (33) One forgets
that Mongolia stretches across the Xinjiang as well as Inner Mongolian
border with China. Chinese policymakers regard a good China-Mongolia
relationship as a significant matter for the security and stability
of their north. (34)
Some new factors suddenly intrude into this
picture of bilateral strategic relations. In the post-September
11, 2001 world the remaining superpower, the United States, has
encouraged all countries to focus on international terrorism. Mongolia,
which immediately supported the U.S. verbally after the attack,
has been surprised by the reaction of its giant neighbors, which
so heavily influence Mongolian mentality. For example, former Ambassador
to the United Nations Enksaihan in an April 5, 2002 speech in Washington,
DC noted: “The first stage of fight against terrorism (i.e.
within the confines of Afghanistan, against Al Qaeda and the Taliban)
seems to bring the three powers closer together. However, it is
not clear if the second stage, if there is to be a second stage,
might, depending on the purpose and content of that stage, alienate
United States from Russia and China, and drive the later two closer
together." (35) Washington and Moscow are cooperating almost
like defacto allies, despite initial disagreement on the need to
go to war in Iraq, bolstered by the positive chemistry between Bush
and Putin. Putin agreed for the former Central Asian republics to
permit U.S. forces to base planes for the war in Afghanistan.
The possibility of Russian-Chinese rapprochement
to counter U.S. influence in the world has been tossed to the side.
Ralph Cossa at the 5th Symposium on Northeast Asian Security in
Ulaanbaatar in fact claimed that China has lost its "Russian
Card." (36). Sino-American relations, so strained in the late
Clinton-early Bush administrations, also dramatically improved after
September 11th. Bush has dropped the "strategic competitor"
rhetoric and both sides seem more committed to building a cooperative,
constructive relationship under the mantle of a new common enemy,
terrorism. Thus the Chinese obtained American support for some groups
of Uighur independence movement fighters in Xinjiang being labeled
as international terrorists. China sees the revival of Islamic religious
nationalism as the greatest threat to its stability. Calling such
elements international terrorists allows the Chinese to increase
repressive policies without totally alienating most of its regional
Islamic neighbors.
Nowadays both China and Mongolia have a vested
interest in stopping unrest and cross-border political activities.
U.S. Admiral Eric A. McVadon in May 2002 warned that Mongolia could
become a tempting alternative location for Islamic terrorists since
its Western regions are vast, basically unpopulated except for Mongolia’s
own Muslim minority Kazaks, and far away from the central government’s
careful monitoring. Because of the still harsh economic times since
the institution of a free market economy, some Mongols and other
foreign nationals could be willing to promote terrorists in western
Mongolia for a price, like what happened in Afghanistan. (37)
Reflecting this new view of Mongolia’s
military and strategic importance is the Defense Attaché
office in the U.S. Embassy in Ulaanbaatar. The Defense Attaché
also functions as the Security Assistance officer and the Liaison
for the American military’s Pacific Command (PACOM). After
9.11 U.S.-Mongolian defense relations were refocused from the aid,
environmental, and training programs of the 1990s to integration
into the “three pillars” strategy for the country as
developed under U.S. Ambassador John Dinger. The three pillars are:
1) Securing Mongolia’s borders against illegal border incursions,
criminal activities to finance terrorism, and transnational terrorism,
especially Uighur separatists of western China. 2) Preparing the
Mongolian military to act as international peacekeepers, as evidenced
by the dispatch of Mongol soldiers to both Afghanistan and Iraq.
3) Improving Mongolia’s capacity to responds to natural disasters.
(38)
Mongolia immediately aftger September 11th
issued a commemorative stamp to raise money for the Twin Tower victims
and dispatched a few soldiers for international peacekeeping duties
in Bangaladesh as tangible evidence of its pro-U.S. policy. The
United States in its reexamination of its anti-terrorism strategic
thinking concluded that Mongolia could be a potential model for
post-Cold War countries such as Afghanistan and even North Korea.
(39) Mongolia's pursuits of simultaneous political and economic
reform is supported enthusiastically by Washington, which has a
vested interest in the success of its democratic experiment. Mongolia
has been cited as the competing model to that of the PRC, because
China has utilized the concept of an Asian model of development
that stresses economic reform over political democratization and
now is at odds with Washington over human rights issues. Mongolia's
decision to do both democratization and economic liberalization
together has met with strong Congressional approval and the country
has become a favored donor aid recipient (even though its economic
success has been uneven and corruption has grown to an alarming
degree).
China surely watches carefully the great
attention lavished on Mongolia by the U.S. The glowing reports by
First Lady Hillary Rodman Clinton about idyllic Mongolia after the
tumultuous and negative American reaction to events in Beijing during
the UN Conference on Women in 1995, the recent expansion of the
Defense Attache's office in the U.S. Embassy in Ulaanbaatar, the
2002 creation of a U.S. Embassy regional security office in Mongolia,
and U.S. encouraged Mongol troop deployment in Afghanistan and especially
Iraq are examples of Mongolian-American bilateral activities which
certainly must concern China. The U.S. military is contemplating
utilizing in a limited way the abandoned ex-Soviet airbase at Choir,
only 500 miles from North Korea. At this time it is not likely Choir
would be transformed into a significant American base but only repaired
so its runway could handle U.S. planes. (40) American businessmen
are very active in mineral and energy sectors in Mongolia. China
knows that the donor community program in Mongolia is dominated
by the U.S., even though Japan and Germany rank above the Americans
in the level of assistance. It has been claimed the invitation for
the Mongol Prime Minister to go to Beijing and talk with Premier
Zhu Rongji in January 2002 was likely just as much motivated by
China’s concern over the meeting of the Mongol Prime Minister
in November 2001 with President Bush, the first such meeting in
history, as by China’s desire to explain to its neighbor its
WTO strategy. (41) The January 31-February 1, 2004 visit of U.S.
Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, which resulted in agreement
for Mongol President Bagabandi to make a state visit to Washington,
DC, is likely to elicit Chinese response. There are many minor irritants
in the Mongolian-Chinese relationship today which could grow into
more serious issues in the future if the climate between the U.S.
and China cools.
Because Mongolia shares a 4,677 km. border
with China, most of which is contiguous with minority regions, border
issues are always delicate. In principle, the two countries have
no outstanding, unresolved border disputes. Yet, other problems
involving the borders have developed in the 1990s.
Since Mongolia is such a large country which is very sparsely populated
(2.5 million) and border regions are usually peopled by nomads with
towns far from the actual borders, rustlers, pouchers, smugglers,
tax evaders, and illegals are emerging as irritants in the bilateral
relationship. Both countries are very concerned about the smuggling
of animal by-products such as cashmere through the porous southern
borders without the paying of any taxes. Huge revenues are lost
by both governments. In August 2002 Xinjiang Military District of
the PLA visited Ulaanbaatar to discuss implementation of an intergovernmental
agreement on Mongolian-Chinese Frontier Regulations. (42) The parties
discussed whether both sides would permit border troops to move
beyond the present 30 km limit to capture livestock rustlers, and
the dismantling of intelligence activities along the border. (43)
70% of the Mongol border with China has an iron net fence which
is only inspected once a day. China is now building on its side
a solid 2 meter-high fence with concrete poles to stop illegal crossing
of people and animals. In 2002 there were already 1113 border poles.
The joint Mongolian and Chinese Frontier Commission planned to add
another 420 in 2003. (44) In the east of Mongolia smuggling of cars
which was a big problem has decreased because of firm measures taken
by the Chinese border guards.
Mongolian strategic security planning was
rocked by the North Korean 2003 declaration of its nuclear power
status. An even more sensitive issue has arisen involving the smuggling
of North Koreans into North China via Mongolia. The number of such
trespassers in 2000 increased noticeably, and over 150 crossed the
northern border of Mongolia illegally in 2001. A few of the illegals
were Chinese citizens but most were North Korean nationals. One
method of exit for the North Koreans now is to flee to South Korea
or China through Mongolia, helped by Inner Mongols and Chinese Koreans.
North Koreans who reach Mongolia even approach the South Korean
Embassy for asylum. More than one hundred North Koreans left for
Seoul in this way in 2001. Often they escape to the Mongol Zamin-Uud
border station on the Chinese border as a way to get to the South
Korean Embassy in Ulaanbaatar. In the summer of 2002 the head of
the Mongolian Ministry of Foreign Affair's Press Department denied
the truth of a Reuter's wire service story which mentioned Mongolia
would establish special refugee camps for North Koreans. The spokesman
reminded the press that Mongolia was not a signatory to the international
treaty assuring protection for asylum seekers. (45) The PRC sees
the growing North Korean refugee problem as impacting on its own
domestic security. Of course, North Korea is also displeased and
Mongolia is forced to make amends to maintain good ties. For example,
in November 2001 Mongolia delivered 10 tons of meat, some horses
and goats to North Korea as "aid". (46)
The Tibetan issue also adds friction to the
Sino-Mongolian relationship. In the democratic era Mongols are increasingly
avid Tibetan-style Buddhists with strong loyalty to the Dalai Lama.
His Holiness has visited Mongolia several times, but in recent years
has not been able to come because the Russians, in deference to
the Chinese, would not issue a transit visa. (47) It should be pointed
out that the Russian decision came after Chinese President Jiang
Zemin visited Moscow and signed a new treaty of friendship.
Finally, regional cooperation and how Mongolia
and China view their place in Asia, may be the most important new
factor influencing their strategic considerations in the 21st century.
China believes it should be the Asian regional leader (48), and
Mongolia, recognizing this Chinese goal, sees developing closer
economic and environment links to its big neighbor as its best way
to integrate into Northeast Asia and assure its access to the Pacific
via Tianjin. The two nations see cooperation as essentially divided
into two parts. The first is along the Xinjiang border, primarily
for national security and anti-international terrorism reasons,
as described above. The other part is along the Inner Mongolian
border in contact with Mongolia’s south and eastern provinces.
Cooperation here faces different problems than in the Muslim area.
Poverty, environmental degradation, and desertification
are shared difficulties impacting on economic development. Eastern
Mongolia’s Dornod Province is 4.8 times the area of Xingan
Prefecture in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region but Xingan’s
population is 9.5 times that of Dornod. Both regions are isolated
from the economic centers in their respective countries and have
low population densities. Both areas are comparatively poor—Xingan’s
GDP per capita of $462 is 8 times lower than China’s average
and Dornod’s GDP is 16 times lower than the Mongolian average
with one-third of the province below the poverty level. (49) Dornod
and other eastern provinces have seen their industrial bases of
animal-by products processing and light construction crumble in
the post-socialist period. Herding animals is the economic mainstay
while agriculture, which could be developed, has regressed. Now
there are plans for a Chinese joint venture to open more land there
to sustainable farming, and Mongolia seeks Chinese investment in
restarting by-products factories. There was a powdered milk factory
joint venture with a Chinese company designed to export its product
to the PRC, but it stopped because of lack of capital. There is
a new joint venture idea for cotton to be imported from the PRC
to Mongolia and then re-exported to the U.S., employing 300 Mongols.
Wool processing which used to be active in Choibalsan and sold to
Russia is now being reoriented to China. (50) Meat exports which
were going to Russia in 2002 were banned to stop the spread of food
and mouth disease, so increasingly are diverted to the China market.
Even fish in local rivers is now being sold to China.
Mongolian minerals such as copper and coal
could be sold in greater quantities to the PRC and other Northeast
countries. The major bottleneck is poor transportation links to
bring the ores out. Rail connections between Mongolia and China
are not of the same size gauge so what lines exist are not compatible.
There are no direct connections from the east of Mongolia to China,
although there are many discussions about linking the largest eastern
city in Mongolia, Choibalsan, to the Chinese city of Arshan, which
then would connect China to Siberian Russian oil and natural gas.
There is also an idea to send oil from Mongolia’s Tamsagbulag
basin to Ulanhot in Inner Mongolia for refining or even for the
Chinese to build a refinery in Choibalsan. Another development proposal
is for a PRC loan of $US12.5 million to mine zinc in Suhbaatar province
that would be carried by truck to the TransMongolian Railway for
shipment to the PRC for processing. Similar ideas exist for brick
and concrete fabrication for Choibalsan with Chinese customers and
shared ecological tourism development. (51) Ideas abound, but money
is scarce or at least the Mongols are not satisfied with the terms
for Chinese investment.
One special area of Chinese-Mongolian cooperation
is in environmental matters. The countries have formulated national
and local Agenda 21 policies to promote sustainable development.
Both nations are seriously affected by land degradation and desertification.
Mongolia established a national program to fight desertification
with the support of the ADB, China, Japan, Korea, the UN Nature
and Environment Program, and under the UNCED Thematic Program Networks
seeks to strengthen capacities for drought impact management and
desertification control. Mongolia will implement a $1 million technical
assistance project called "Prevention and Control of dust and
sandstorms in Northeast Asia." Funding will come from the ADB
and the World Wide Nature Conservation Fund. (52) China is taking
the lead for the Northeast Asian region to monitor and assess desertification
and environmental cooperation. This cooperation is not just in the
Gobi border regions, but also in the Altai areas shared by Mongolia,
Russia, China and Kazakhstan. A new Fund has been organized to look
at maintaining and more carefully exploiting the pure water reserve
around Lake Baikal. (53)
Prof. N. Altantsetseg believes that the last
ten years of the 20th Century were a turning point in the foreign
policy of Mongolia as the country transitioned towards democracy
and a market economy. The end of the Cold War permitted Mongolia
to pursue an independent foreign policy, while safeguarding the
independence, security and welfare of the people remain the main
goals. Although aiming to diversify its foreign relations, Mongolia’s
geographical location between the nuclear powers Russia and China
heavily influences its freedom of action and the scope of its relations
with other foreign states. Altantsetseg asserts that ““The
Mongolian and Chinese Joint Communique” of 1998 and “Mongolo-Russian
Declaration of Ulaanbaatar” of 2000 determined the main direction
and goals of the relations between our countries.” (54) In
her analysis, although Russian-Mongolian political and diplomatic
relations in the new century are active again, economic, social,
health, and scientific ties are stagnant, whereas China has expanded
its relations with Mongolia in all areas significantly. (55)
The next decades of the 21st century present
interesting yet complex opportunities for Mongolian-Chinese cooperation
which impact directly on both nations’ strategic concerns.
While the view of Professor Morris Rossabi of Columbia University
that "Mongolia has all but become a Chinese satellite"
(56) is an exaggeration, the possibility is not that far-fetched
if the Mongolian Government does not control the situation. China
has the money to exploit the rich oil, uranium, rare earth minerals,
coal and salt resources of eastern Mongolia if Mongolian authorities
want to tie their economy more closely to that of China, which is
a big "if". To move in this direction better transportation
links, both rail and road, are needed. A first step is to join the
railroads 35 km. from the Mongol border to Arshan in Jilin Province,
but this would cost hundreds of millions of dollars. The two nations
already have agreed to build a paved road with bridge on the Mongol
side to be completed in 2002. The Mongols had hoped an oil pipeline
for Siberian oil to Central China would be built through their country.
The decision to avoid Mongolia completely, although it would be
much more expensive and a longer route, was announced in 2002 by
Russia and China. Now Mongolia pins its hopes on a western natural
gas pipeline in 10-20 years which would connect Siberia and Xinjiang,
The ADB commissioned a study to provide cross-border
development strategy to strengthen economic cooperation between
the two countries. The study is to develop options, particularly
in the transport sector with such ideas as the railway between Choibalsan
and Arshan, improving border roads, maintaining a border station,
as well as facilitating the export of Mongolian minerals to the
PRC, developing eco-tourism and agricultural projects. The ADB is
also looking southward from Ulaanbaatar to establish a 700 km road
to the Chinese border. The first 230 km was funded in 2002 for building
a road to the Mongol city of Choir that later can be extended south
to the border city of Zamin-Uud. (57) More elaborate plans also
are being discussed, such as that of the Indians, who propose building
a railway in the west to connect China and Mongolia from north India
through Yarkand to western Mongolia and on to Russia. (58)
China and Mongolia enter the 21st century
at a turning point in their bilateral relationship. Both countries
seek above all to preserve national integrity. Impacting on this
are new challenges posed by international terrorism, the rise of
the political influence of the U.S. in a uni-superpower world, environmental
degradation, and free market economic development which can take
them down unwanted and unforeseen paths. These peoples have common
cultural and historical backgrounds and histories full of tension
and misunderstandings. Whether the future will move the two nations
towards cooperation or confrontation is not clear. Certainly today
the wind blows towards cooperation, which is a promising scenario
both governments welcome.
NOTES:
1. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, September 3, 2002
quoting Reuters.
2. N. Altantsetseg, “Russian-Mongolian and Sino-Mongolian
Relations since nineties,” in The Geopolitical Relations between
Contemporary Mongolia and Neighboring Asian Countries: Democracy,
Economy and Security, Taipei: Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs, 2003,
pg. 374.
3. Tsedendambyn Batbayar, "Mongolian Perspectives on Northeast
Asian Regional Development," Chapter 9, Politics and Economics
in Northeast Asia, Tsuneo Akaha editor, New York: St. Martin's Press,
1999, pp. 208-209.
4. Ibid., pg. 210.
5. Ts. Batbayar, "The Development of Mongolia's External Relations
in the 1990s," Renovation of Mongolia on the Eve of the XXI
Century and Future Development Patterns, Tsedendambyn Batbayar editor,
Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Development Research Center, 2000, pg. 79.
6. Ibid., pg. 76.
7. Ts. Batbayar and K. Demberel, “Contemporary Mongolian-Russian
Relations: Problems and Perspectives,” The Geopolitical Relations
between Contemporary Mongolia and Neighboring Asian Countries: Democracy,
Economy and Security, ibid, pg.341.
8. Sumio Kuribayashi, “Structural Change and Economic Performance
in Mongolia,” The Geopolitical Relations between Contemporary
Mongolia and Neighboring Asian Countries: Democracy, Economy and
Security, ibid., Table 21, pg. 79.
9. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, September 19, 2002.
10. Altantsetseg, ibid., pg. 376 citing L. Erdenechuluun, “The
principal document of the friendly relations, Foreign relations,
No. 2 (126), Ulaanbaatar: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2003, pg.
10.
11. Altantsetseg, ibid., pp. 374-75.
12. emailnews daily, No. 180, (1509), Ulaanbaatar, September 16,
2002 and MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, October 1, 2002.
13. “Mongolian and Chinese Joint Communique,” Foreign
relations, No. 7 (57), Ulaanbaatar: Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
1999, pg. 6.
14. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, September 24, 2002.
15. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, September 7, 2002.
16. emailnews daily, No. 236, Ulaanbaatar, December 5, 2001; and
Altantsetseg, ibid., pg. 379. Note typed errors in original text:
1990 should be 1999 and 2001 written instead of 2002.
17. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, March 26, 2001.
18. Altantsetseg, ibid., pg. 381.
19. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, October 3, 2002.
20. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, September 10 and 30, 2002.
21. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, October 1, 2002.
22. Altantsetseg, ibid., pg. 381.
23. Batbayar, "Mongolian Perspectives," ibid., pg. 210.
24. Altantsetseg, ibid., pp. 375-76.
25. B. Ooluun, "Tax Cut hopes dashed," Unen, Ulaanbaatar,
July 31, 2002, pg. 4.
26. Robert D. Kaplan, “The Man Who Would be Khan,” The
Atlantic Monthly, March 2004, pg. 62.
27. Op. cit.
28. Hu Weixing, "Economic and Security Cooperation in Northeast
Asia A Chinese Perspective," in Politics and Economics, ibid.,
pg. 109.
29. Ibid., pg. 110.
30. Li Dongyan, "The Interaction between Northeast Asian Cooperation
and Chinese Development Strategy," in Political, Security,
Economic and infrastructure Factors of Economic Cooperation in the
Northeast Asia, Lhamsurengiin Nyamtseren editor, Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian
Development Research Center, 2002, pg. 32.
31. Ibid., pp. 34-46.
32. Ibid., pg. 30.
33. For further analysis of Chinese policies towards Islamic separatists
in Xinjiang see George, Paul, "Islamic unrest in the Xinjiang
Uighur Autonomous Region," Commentary, No. 73, Canada Security
Intelligence Service, Spring 1998.
34. Yang Fan and Zhu Ning, "The Strategic Significance of West
Development," Economics Selections, No. 32, June 2000, Chinese
Financial Economy Press, pg. 15 note that "to keep a good China-Mongolia
relationship is regarded as a significant matter for the security
and stability of north China, including Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia,
and northeast provinces," as quoted by Hu in Politics and Economics,
ibid., pg. 30. This author believes the same could be said for any
time in Chinese history.
35. J. Enkhsaikhan, "New Sino-Russian treaty of friendship:
legal and political consequences for third States," at a panel
on "Mongolia and the New Russo-Chinese Friendship Treaty"
sponsored by The Mongolia Society, Washington, DC, April 5, 2002,
pp. 3-4.
36. Cossa, Ralph A., "U.S. Northeast Asia Foreign Policy Post
9-11: Has Everything Changed?", The 5th Symposium on Northeast
Asian Security, Ulaanbaatar: The Institute for Strategic Studies,
Vol. 15, 2002, pg. 41.
37. McVadon, Eric A., "China, Russia, Mongolia, and Central
Asia in the Coming Decade," Woodrow Wilson International Center
for Scholars Seminar on "Mongolia as the link of Stability
between Central and Northeast Asia," Washington, DC, April
17, 2002, pg. 7.
38. Kaplan, ibid., pp. 57-58.
39. Cossa, ibid., pg. 48.
40. Kaplan, ibid., pg. 69.
41. North American Mongolian Business Council private e-mail, January
2, 2002.
42. "Chinese Military Delegates in Ulaanbaatar," UB Post,
Ulaanbaatar, August 1, 2002, pg. 1.
43. Mongolia News, Embassy of Mongolia, Washington, DC, 1999, No.
6, pp. 4-5.
44. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, October 7, 2002.
45. S. Batmagna, "No Refugee Camps in Mongolia," Mongolia
this Week, Ulaanbaatar, July 2, 2002, pg. 3.
46. emaildailynews, Ulaanbaatar, No. 217, November 7, 2001 quoting
Ug Mong article of B. Selenge, "Is Mongolia becoming a Mediator?"
47. "Russia blocks Dalai Lama visit as ties improve with Beijing,"
Mongol Tolbo, Issue 23, Mongol-American Cultural Association, Inc.,
New Brunswick, NJ, August 2001, pg. 4.
48. Pomfret, John, "In Its own Neighborhood, China Emerges
as Leader," Washington Post Online Foreign Service, October
18, 2001, pg. A01.
49. Ts. Sukhbaatar, "The Cooperation Possibilities between
Eastern Mongolia and Xingan Prefecture, Inner Mongolia," Political,
Security, ibid., pg. 92.
50. Ibid., pg. 95.
51. Ibid., pg. 97-98.
52. L. Nyamtseren and D. Dagvadorj, "Northeast Asian Cooperation
Towards Sustainable Development," Political, Security, ibid.,
pg. 6-7.
53. MONTSAME, Ulaanbaatar, August 28, 2002.
54. Altantsetseg, ibid., pp. 356 and 369.
55. Altantsetseg, ibid., pg. 382.
56. Pomfret, ibid.
57. Sukhbaatar, ibid., pg. 92 and B. Batbayar, "Linking Development
of Eastern Mongolia with Northeast Asia Economic Integration, Political,
Security, ibid., pg. 63.
58. B. Enebish, "Contribution of Mongolia to Northeast Asia
Economy," Political, Security, ibid., pg. 81.

|
|